Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Tablet War: Why do I need a tablet, anyway?





Wallet Moths:

Motorola Atrix 4G

Motarola Atrix Lapdock

OK. for thise who've been following with bated breath, you'll know a week or so ago I got the Motorola Xoom in anticipation of the iPad 2 release. I've had an iPad since day one last year and I've really liked it. But since then, I've been curious as to what the upstarts (Android) can do.


I gravitated from an iPhone to the Samsung Captivate last summer. I liked the promise of Android and aspects of the Captivate, but at the same time, the phone was buggy and frustrating from day one. I wanted to throw it against the wall most of the time. But when I upgraded the phone to Android 2.2 it got better.  Not good, but better.

The Xoom has better specs all around than the iPad 2. Android doesn't have the ecosystem of apps that Apple has. So I picked up the Xoom with every intention of returning it after i played around with it a while. And return it I will. At this writing, there's no other option in purchsing the Xoom other than buying the 3G version for $800, even though I have no interest in 3G. There is a wifi version coming out in a couple weeks, but that's going to be $600. Still more specs than the bargain basement iPad at $500, but still the same problem in terms of the apps and usefulness. I know that the Android Marketplace will catch up eventually, but what am I going to do with the thing until then?

That question got me thinking: What the hell do I need a tablet for anyway? The iPad is cool and I've used it, but my real hope was that it'd become an extension of my studio and a real boon to on-the-go writing and, well, it hasn't. It's a fun toy and great for surfing the web (but not as great as the Xoom). My daughter uses it more to play games like Big Buck Hunter (don't ask) than I do. What I use it most for is taking quick notes in meetings and such. Is that really worth $500?

Then I got to thinking. I hate my current phone, I like the Xoom. Motorola just came out with the Atrix, which is exactly the same as the Xoom inside, but is a phone. If I could convince the folks at ATT to let me upgrade early--really early--then I could solve all my probelms, because the Atrix also has waht they call a "Lapdock." It's this 11.6" super thin laptop shell that is powered by the phone itself. You can access all the functionality of the phone, including calls and texting. You can access all the apps. And the Lapdock uses a Webtop interface when paired to the phone to access a really limited bunch of apps and Firefox.It's a barebones setup, but compellig because it kills two birds: I have to have a phone but I also want to be able to do work with a lighteight, portable interface. Honestly, while using the keypad on the iPad was fine most of the time, it wasn't ideal and i'm not sure it ever will be. For one thing, as a writer, I cursed the burying of the quotation marks on the second screen of the keyboard. It made it impossible to do serious work on the thing. I found a couple apps that change the keyboard, but they had their own problems. I did like to edit on my iPad though, for some reason.

So yesterday I was at the mall for a few errands and I stopped into the ATT store to complain more about my Captivate. And I took a look at the Atrix. A very sweet phone. Comparable to Xoom in terms if speed, etc., although I like the unadulterated Honeycomb OS of the Xoom better than the Motoblur of the Atrix. Then my ATT guy (I know, weird I could say that, right?) jacks the phone into the Lapdock. It boots right away, like, in a few seconds. There's the phone. There's Firefox. Seems cool. I'm more than intrigued.

Let's get this out of the way: minutes before I'd bought a $100 gift card at Best Buy to reserve an iPad 2 when the next bath comes in (I was shutout on launch day because of personal issues beyond my control). But before that I was bemoaning to the wife how in many ways a netbook is more attractive to me than a tablet, especially if the idea is productivity. Now, I have no desire for a netbook. But there in the ATT store was what amounted to a netbook that I could power with my phone. If I could convince the ATT folks to let me upgrade after only 8 months with the Craptivate.

So I asked my guy what I could get out of the store paying  for the phone and the Lapdock. Out of contract, the phone is $600 and the dock $500. No way. And supposedly you have to add tethering to a data plan to the tune of $45 all tolled. Also not happening. I thought my dreams of trying this combo instead of the iPad were dead. But then my ATT guy worked some magic and I walked out of the store with the Atrix and the Lapdock for $500 and no tethering plan. It was black gadget magic. Pretty slick.

So now I'm typing this blog post on the Lapdock. The Lapdock is powered by my new phone (which is awesome) and it is nice to use a real keyboard while watching round one of the Tournament. Could I be using the Macbook resting three feet away? Yes, but this is compact and light. I said IT'S COMPACT AND LIGHT!!!!

Is it an iPad killer? No. But I think its also a harbinger of the future. As phones get more powerful, they will subsume the other devices, making the iPad obsolete, until the head of Steve Jobs in a glass jar invents the iPaper.

The Lapdock is good enough, but not full featured. It's balky in performance and ultimately won't offer enough performance to justify keeping it, just like the Xoom. But it is a device worth noting.

But let's be honest, when the call comes that my iPad 2 has arrived, this thing will go back to the store and the iPad will take its rightful, if not reluctant place in my bag as the best of a bunch of imperfect devices out there. If Moto and others really wanted to compete with Sensei Jobs, they'd do a better job of matching price points and concentrate on a few products and making them great instead of many that remain underdeveloped. That's how Apple dominated the market. Others who wish to compete need to learn the lesson.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Motorola Xoom vs. iPad vs. iPad2: The prelude

I got a Moto Xoom over the weekend to take on a test run in the lead up to the iPad2 release. The Xoom is the first real contender to challenge the iPad's supremacy (or should I say "magicalness"). It's specs outstrip the mach one iPad by a landslide. It's actually more specced out than the iPad2 as well. You can find detailed descriptions of how the thing differs from King iPad all over the internet, so I'm not going to dwell on that here. Over the next few days I'll keep fooling with it and then on Friday I'll check out the iPad2.

What concerns me most is whether either device builds on the foundation of the iPad1 enough to make them worth buying. I have used my iPad a lot in the past year. I'd like to see if either of these machines can build on that.

I can say that the Xoom is crazy fast and the notification systen is WAY better than iOS. Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), is the best iteration of Android I've seen yet.

Major downside: the thing costs $800. Can I justify keeping it with that price tag when I can go iPad2 for $500?

Stay tuned for the full smackdown coming soon.

Monday, March 7, 2011

In which I try to stream music Pt 2: And the winner is....

APPLE TV!!!!!

(FYI: This post is Part 2 of an exploration. See Part 1 here.)

I fooled around with the PC for the whole weekend a week ago. I got XBMC loaded. I tried to get Ubuntu working and finally got it to connect to my network but then couldn't get it to access my music library. And then I just stuck the thing downstairs connected to the home theater, still running Windows XP, still slow as Moses, and I'm going to use it as a glorified jukebox when I want some music in the HT.

The Apple TV was just so simple to setup up. And the Remote app makes it so easy to control it's just a no-brainer. I've watched a couple movies streaming and they're great. Watch Netflix with no problems. But for me the big win is that my whole music library is now available upstairs. And the Apple TV even knows what I last listened to at the PC. Pretty darn slick.

Most--no all--of the reviews I've read about the Apple TV focus on the video viewing capabilities of the Apple TV. Yes, it is more limited than other options (Roku, etc.), but it is the only set-top that will stream music as easily as this thing. And for me, that's the most important thing. I can now sit on my couch upstairs and enjoy music again without hooking up my phone.

Thanks, Apple TV! You're swell.

The Apple TV, for being awesome, but not allowing me to rule the world with an all-mighty fist, gets 4 Wallet Moths:

Trying to jerry rig an old PC into a media streaming behemoth gets 2 Wallet Moths, mostly because it was fun to mess around with, but ultimately a waste of time.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

iPad 2...iPad 1 with cameras?

OK, so the big announcement has come. iPad2 is here. It's thinner. It comes in white (I'll believe that when I see it.). It has an available magnetic cover in different colors. But the thing is not a case, it's a cover. The back of the thing will remain unprotected by this precious-looking little piece of eye candy.

The good is that there's a dual-core A5 processor in there, so it'll be faster. And there's better graphics and a gyroscope like iPhone 4. And there are 2 cameras (front-facing and on the back) that are 720p.

I personally don't care about cameras on the iPad. I never thought it would be a device that taking pictures on would make sense. Just imagine holding the thing up and trying to steady it for a photo. There are some many devices better for that, like say, your camera.

But I digress.

The one important piece of tech that remains the same is the screen. I haven't been happy with the resolution on my iPad and have forsaken it as a reading device because the rendering of text was causing me a lot of eye strain. If the iPad2 had a new screen with better resolution, I might have been in line waiting for it, but now I don't know. It's pretty slick looking and I'm sure it's "Magical(TM)" but I don't see how the features that matter most to me have been significantly altered in this new version enough to make it make sense for me to buy one.

Will I suffer a bout of TAD (Tech Acquisition Disorder) and have to get one anyway? Maybe. But as of now It seems tome a nice update, but not worthy of selling the year-old iPad for the emperor's new clothes.

What do you think? To buy or not to buy?

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Amanda Hocking has sold over 900,000 books...

...since last April.

That's absolutely insane.

What's even more insane is she's completely self-published.

I haven't read any of the books (but I just might to see what the fuss is about), but from the descriptions, they're genre fiction. Now, that's not a pejorative; I like genre stuff. I say this because I continue to follow the self publishing thing with an eye toward going that route myself. But my finished novel is not genre fiction. It's literary fiction. If I had any proof that literary fiction could enjoy that kind of success, then I'd think about self-publishing even harder. Something tells me that it wouldn't be a bad idea to get out in front of the whole thing. Who knows.

Just for shits and giggles, I've copied in some sales numbers for ebook sales on Amazon for December. Very interesting.

These are DECEMBER sales figures for some indie authors. In other words, they account for only 31 days of sales.

Blake Crouch - 2500+
Nathan Lowell - 2500+
Beth Orsoff - 2500+
Sandra Edwards - 2500+
Vianka Van Bokkem - 2500+
Maria Hooley - 2500+
C.S. Marks - 2500+
Lee Goldberg - 2500+
Lexi Revellian - 4000+
Zoe Winters - 4000+
Aaron Patterson - 4000+
Bella Andre - 5000+
Imogen Rose - 5000+
Ellen Fisher - 5000+
Tina Folsom - 5000+
Terri Reid - 5000+
David Dalglish - 5000+
Scott Nicholson - 10,000+
J.A. Konrath 10,000+
Victorine Lieske - 10,000+
L.J. Sellers - 10,000+
Michael R. Sullivan - 10,000+
H.P. Mallory - 20,000+
Selena Kitt - 20,000+
Stephen Leather - 40,000+
Amanda Hocking - 100,000+


Part of me really wants to walk up to a publisher and invoke Amanda Hocking's name just to see if said publisher explodes.

Here's a link to her blog: http://amandahocking.blogspot.com/



What say you, writing friends? This could be the future staring us right in the face, n'est pas?

Saturday, February 26, 2011

In Which I Try to Stream Music Throughout the House, Part 1

VS.

All right, I looove my digital life, sure, but ever since my music went digital, I haven't been satisfied with my listening experience. I never liked jacking my phone into the AV receiver and I've had trouble getting a satisfying, high-quality solution streaming from a server to the various spots in the house where there are couches and I could chill and listen. So last night I embarked on a two part mission.

1) Take an old laptop I have here in the house and repurpose it as a media PC using a linux-based OS (for speed) and a program like XBMC or Boxee.

2) Buy an Apple TV (now only $99 and literally the size of a hockey puck) and see if that  would be a better solution than my abortive attempt at using an Airport Express a couple years ago. Since that time I've upgraded our router to an Airport Extreme, so I thought the chances were good for success.

So last night I spent hours fooling with the PC and never got it up and running right. I tried Ubuntu and it wouldn't hold a reliable wireless connection long enough to download any software. It was fun to mess around with the thing, but I would have liked to have had some result.

So I went to bed and woke up this morning with the plan fully formed in my head. Vaughan had a birthday party to go to at the mall, so I bought the Apple TV while we were waiting for that to be over. I would bring it home, install it on one TV and then I'd install the PC on the other (if I can ever get it running reliably) and see which one wins.

So far, the Apple TV installed in ten minutes, found all my music, videos and pictures in one minute and is now playing away in the downsatirs home theater as I type.

The laptop is one the floor, waiting for me to install Xubuntu (a little smaller, faster version of Ubuntu) to see if I can get it going.

The Apple TV functions with the touchscreen of the iPad as well, making it one of the best user experiences I've had with a remote ever.

Round 1 winner: Apple TV by a long shot. Not only because it was easy to get up and running, the Remote app, plus the easy navigation are pretty sweet. Stay tuned for round 2, where we'll see if the laptop can come out swinging.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Dynamite Yorke!


OK, I wanted Thom Yorke and Napoleon Dynamite to dance to "Lotus Flower" together. So I made it happen.